Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
COVID-19 Critical and Intensive Care Medicine Essentials ; : 159-166, 2022.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2321370

ABSTRACT

In COVID-19 patients, CV manifestations include venous and pulmonary thromboembolism, acute heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias, arterial thrombotic events, acute coronary syndromes, myocarditis, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.

3.
European Heart Journal Supplements ; 24(SUPPL C):2, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1885129
5.
European Heart Journal ; 42(SUPPL 1):2669, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1554037

ABSTRACT

Background: Long-term effects of Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID- 19) and their sustainability are of the utmost relevance. For the chronic phase, the main concerns are the development of pulmonary interstitial disease and/or lingering cardiovascular involvement. How to intercept, assess, and treat these patients with long-term consequences of COVID-19 remains uncertain. Purpose: We aimed to determine: 1) functional capacity of COVID-19 survivors by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET);2) those characteristics associated with CPET performance;3) safety and tolerability of CPET. Methods: We prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with laboratoryconfirmed COVID-19 discharged alive at a single hospital in northern Italy. At 3-month from hospital discharge, complete clinical evaluation, transthoracic echocardiography, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), pulmonary function test (PFT), and dominant leg extension (DLE) maximal strength evaluation were performed. Results: From 225 patients discharged from March to November 2020 we excluded 12 incomplete/missing cases, and 13 unable to perform CPET leading to a final population of 200 patients. At PFT all median parameters were within normality range. Median percent-predicted peak oxygen uptake (%pVO2) was 88% (78.3- 103.1). Ninety-nine (49.5%) patients had %pVO2 below, whereas 101 (50.5%) above the 85% predicted value (indicating normality). Sixteen (16.2%) patients had respiratory, 28 (28.9%) cardiac, 21 (21.2%) mixed-cardiopulmonary, and 34 (34.3%) non-cardiopulmonary limitation of exercise. One-hundred sixty (80.0%) patients complain at least one symptom, without relationship with peakVO2. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed percent-predicted forced expiratory volume in one-second (β=5.29, p=0.023), percent-predicted diffusing capacity of lungs for carbon monoxide (β=6.31, p=0.001), and DLE maximal strength (β=14.09, p=0.008) independently associated with peakVO2. At sensitivity analysis, the results of previous multivariate linear regression analysis were also similar among sub-groups of patients with no previous significant disease in anamnesis (cardiovascular disease except for arterial hypertension, respiratory disease, kidney disease, or cancer) and of those with a length of hospital stay ≤7 days. None major event was reported during/after CPET, whereas only two cases (1.0%) had a mild symptomatic hypotension post exercise. None of the involved health professionals developed COVID-19. Conclusions: CPET after COVID-19 is safe and about 1/3rd of COVID-19 survivors show functional capacity limitation mainly explained by muscular impairment, calling for future research to identify patients at higher risk of long-term effects that may benefit from careful surveillance and targeted rehabilitation. (Figure Presented).

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL